Market Access Intelligence for Ingredients.
You don't sell to one market, you sell to every market your customers do. Your ingredient has to be compliant in all of them, on every spec, on every COA, on every day.
See how it works ↓Market Access Intelligence for beverages: one living view of the taxes, thresholds, sweetener rules, caffeine limits, label laws and claim trends that decide whether a drink reaches the shelf, and stays on it.
What is Market Access Intelligence? →Change hits you first. Then it hits everyone you supply.
food & feed safety alerts raised in the EU every year, raw materials and ingredients are among the most-cited origins.EU RASFF annual report
legacy food additives under EFSA re-evaluation, any single outcome can cascade to every customer recipe that uses it.EFSA additive re-evaluation programme
pesticides carry market-by-market maximum residue limits your incoming COAs must clear, and they keep tightening.EU MRL database
hazards behind alerts, mycotoxins, pesticide residues and pathogens, are all raw-material problems that arrive on a COA.EU RASFF hazard categories
You don't have one compliance footprint. You have all of theirs.
A CPG brand worries about its own markets. You inherit every one of them. One colour, one enzyme, one protein can sit inside hundreds of recipes shipping into dozens of jurisdictions, each with its own permitted list, purity criteria and labelling knock-on. When EFSA re-opens an additive, when an MRL drops, when a contaminant limit tightens, the question isn't "does this affect us?", it's "which grades, which lots, which customers, in which markets, and how fast can we tell them?" That answer is a regulatory affairs team's whole week. It should be a validated event by lunchtime.
A re-evaluation or MRL change hits your ingredient before it hits any finished product. Miss it, and you ship non-compliance downstream to everyone who trusts your spec.
Every prospect and audit brings a stack of "is it compliant in our markets, does it meet our claims" questions. Answering them is slow, manual, and only true until the next rule change.
Cadmium in cocoa, heavy metals in minerals, mycotoxins in botanicals, a number on a COA is only meaningful against the limit for each destination market. Most drift is caught too late.
GRAS conclusions, novel-food authorisations, purity specs, the evidence file behind an ingredient is its licence to sell. When the underlying rule moves, the dossier has to move with it.
The same ingredient can be permitted in food but not in supplements, allowed in the EU but pending in the US, cleared for adults but limited for infant categories. One product, many market-specific answers.
When a downstream additive is restricted, your customers come to you for the replacement, fast. Being ready with a compliant alternative is a commercial advantage, not just a compliance task.
This is exactly what Prodeen is built for: every re-evaluation, MRL revision and COA result caught the moment it moves, matched to your grades, your dossiers and your customers' markets, delivered as a next step your team can act on, not another signal to triage. Questionnaires answered in hours. Dossiers that stay current. The supplier who called first.
See the signal in actionThe COA said cadmium 0.68 mg/kg. Fine for most of the world, over the limit for the customers shipping chocolate into the EU. Same lot, same number, two different verdicts. The job isn't reading the COA; it's knowing, instantly, which of your 200 customers just inherited a problem.
and being the supplier who called them first.Everything that decides if your ingredient can ship, in one view.
Regulatory, Quality, R&D, Procurement, Commercial: one re-evaluation reaches everyone, next step attached. Five connected domains. Signals that turn into action, not alerts to triage.
One loop, from an EFSA opinion to a customer notification.
| EU | US | BR | JP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additive re-evaluations | ||||
| Pesticide MRLs | ||||
| Heavy metals | ||||
| Mycotoxins |
Wherever a grade sits, whatever market it's headed to.
Qualify a grade for a new region
Confirm permitted use, purity criteria and labelling knock-ons before you promise a customer you can supply there.
See the use case → Launching a productBring a new ingredient to market
Map the approval route, GRAS, novel food, pre-market notification, and build the dossier once, structured for every destination.
See the use case → Managing a live portfolioKeep every spec and dossier current
Every re-evaluation, MRL change and COA cross-checked against your grades and your customers' footprints, continuously.
See the use case → Preparing for an auditAnswer the customer questionnaire in hours
A signed, current evidence file per grade, so audits and RFIs stop consuming your senior team's week.
See the use case → Replacing a legacy subscriptionTrade a raw feed for routed intelligence
Stop scanning a database that doesn't know your grades. Get events pre-filtered to your specs and your customers.
See the use case → Not sure yet?Bring us one spec
One ingredient, one COA, one customer market. We'll send back a sample impact report, built on your data, not a template.
Test us →The supply base runs on trusted specs.
From an EFSA re-evaluation or MRL change to a validated impact read your team can action, every source named.
Of incoming signals filtered out as noise before they ever reach your team.Illustrative, based on a typical ingredient portfolio.
Customer regulatory questionnaires answered from a live evidence file, not a fresh research project each time.
Built by the team behind Selerant and DigiComply. This is our third time in your world.